Woman of Sociology

Women of Sociology

1) From what I gathered reading the article “Woman and the birth of sociology” in our book that woman were “written out” of the sociology history meant that they were once a presence in the early stages of sociology and then their male counter parts took the glory. The reason Jane Addams, Anna Julie Cooper and Harriet Martineau and so many others may have been written out was at the time it was considered an all white male agency and women by society were over looked.

2) Most of the women in sociology had many things in common; most were well known public figures, they created their own social theories and built upon or worked with other male sociologists theories. They founded or set up programs to help people who were in need. Most notable was the Hull House, started in Chicago by Jane Addams, a place where women involved in sociology could come and express their ideas and theories.
3) To not recognize the accomplishments of the women involved in sociology in the past who did such a unique service for society with their hard work is a travesty. These women deserve the same recognition as their male counterparts. In today’s society more and more woman are breaking boundaries that have kept them in check. We are seeing woman break the glass ceiling and achieving goals that their sisters of the past could only dream of. I have two daughters who I believe can do anything they set their sights on, they are not limited to yesterdays stereo typing and they know no bounds. I look forward to witnessing the day we have a female president and maybe it will be one of my girls.
Chip

thinness

     Seven million woman today suffer from eating disorders, and there are three theoretical models used to treat and explain these disorders. The three theoretical models consist of the biomedical model, psychological model and the gender model. All models focus on cultural obsession with thinness. The biomedical, psychological and the gender models all link to some type of trauma such as sexual abuse, racism, sexim, herterosexism, classism and poverty. Each model explains that eating is a coping mechanism to deal with some type of trauma. The biomedical and phychological models neglect woman of color, lesbians and working-class women, while the gender model focuses on women of all color and cultures. The biomedical model ignored eating problem that are influenced by cultural and social factors. The psychological model displays eating disorders and identifies them as “multidimensional disorders”, which are influenced by biological, psychological, and cultural factors. The gender modle asserts that eating problems are gendered. Sexual abuse is considered a trauma that contributes to eating disorders. Between one third and two thirds of woman with eating disorders have been sexually abused and can make the connection between their trauma and eating disorder. All models are treated differently. The biomedical model is medically treated, and the gender model is theraputically treated and the gendermodel is treated by individual pathology.

By Alicya

Women and Sociology

1. Generally speaking, when discussing the origins of a science or study, a frequently heard term is “the Founding Fathers”. This phrase right off the bat implies that the most important leading figures in that early history were males. Indeed while a large portion of notable sociologists were men there were 15 women whose names have been “edited from the text” so to speak. Though recognized and respected by their male contemporaries for the work they submitted and for their general high social standing, it would appear as if the following generations gradually lost more and more respect for their contributions until finally excluding them from the record all together. The text from Lengermann and Niebrugge-Brantley does not implictly state why these names were erased but in my opinion, implies a mixture of forgetfulness, lack of respect for women through the years, and of course, politics.

2. These women shared common issues and ideas that would play a crutial part in forming the young science of sociology and establishing its place in the sciences. Each of these women realized the importance of their work and that of their contemporaries. They often collaborated together to create essays and papers on issues of their times such as race and lynching. As American women in that time had yet to be given the rights they now enjoy, many of these women were involved with establishing cooperative housing for working women, gaining access to better employment, and overcoming the gender barriers that were all just a ‘normal’ part of life at that time. Though they all had their own sense of what the science of society should be, they understood the need to unite and made it their moral responsibility to do the most they could from their various walks of life.

3. Fortunately, while they may have been ‘written out’ of the standard history of sociology, we still have much information not to mention the thousands of books, essays, and articles written by these ‘Leading Ladies’. From the establishing of the Hull House by Jane Addams to the helping of organizing of the NAACP by Ida Wells-Barrnett to Women and Economics written by Charlotte Gilman, these accomplishments are well worth our study and respect. Indeed, much of the work done by these ladies is in the very basis and framework of what we know sociology to be today. It is every bit as much a development of women’s minds as is it men’s. Though erased in part, these women’s work will stand and speak for them for centuries to come.

By: Jess

Women and the birth of Sociogy

In Sociology, Woman have been ”written out’ from the history of Sociology. This contribuations are no longer recognized despite having been influential and respected in their time. This woman contributions, fifteen prominent woman were effectively and ”written out ” of the Sociology history. In the late 1830-1930, The early female Sociologists were an integrated part of the community shaping the discipline’s eventual direction.The woman Founders, by Patricia Madoo Lengermann and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. This woman were not recognized for their work and not recognized as much now. They all published several books, studies and theories in history of Sociology. Woman were not giving any specific date which where the names and contributions of fifteen woman expunged and all the credit were given to man associated with Sociology. Several of this woman researched the problems of Race and Ineguality in Sociology.

Woman were not giving any specific date which erasure onlu at some points in time where the names and contributions and credit were giving to man. The reasning was that such a crime of omission were left out and men had all the power, especially educated white man , had everything and ruling class. Whiles woman were looked upon as “Second class Citizens” without any purposed in life but to stay home taking care and raising there children and be pleasing as wives.

I think it is important that we recognized woman role in our Society because we women are trying to work hard as men do. To make this society a better place to live in it and woman deserver tobe recognized for this hard working. This woman made a great changes and impact in the early days of Sociology and every where else.
by Cuteg

Women and the Birth of Sociology

When it is said that women have been “written out” of sociology’s history it is not to say that women have been non­­‑existent from the history but rather that somewhere along the way their existence was ignored. Early women sociologists were recognized as an integral part of their community and most of the prominent female figures were part of sociological associations and were even published.  Sadly these women were victims of their time.  Although these women gave so much to their community, because men dominated the world and their field at the time, the majority of the credit is given to their male counterparts.

Most of the early women of sociology were conflict theorist’s and concentrated on civil rights and gender issues.  A majority of the women that have been “written out” were members of the American Sociological Association and worked hand and hand with the men that have been credited with having written sociological history.

It is important that today we recognize the women of sociology.  Women like Jane Addams, Sophonisba Breckinridge, Marianne Webber, and Edith and Grace Abbott.  These women worked tirelessly on the very inequalities that have kept them “written out” of sociologies history.  To continue to write them out would be like saying that they never have existed and that their work was not important.

culture of thinness

It’s amazing to learn how many people actually have eating disorders. According to the America anorexia/ bulimia association, 7 million woman and 1 million men starting at the age of ten to early twenties suffer from eating disorders, and 1000 woman die from them every year. Starting at an early age kids receive the message that being fat is not cool or attractive and to be attractive you have to be skinny. I chose this topic because I have family members who had eating disorders and wanted to learn what causes them. A person might wonder why anyone would starve themselves. Do people starve themselves because their simply not happy with their weight? Eating disorders are caused by many things starting from poverty, sexual abuse, racism, heterosexism, social class inequality, and acculturation.
There are three theoretical models used to treat eating disorders. The first is the biomedical model, the second is the psychological model, and the third is offered by feminist. The biomedical model displays important information about the physiological causes of eating problems and how it leads to anorexia and bulimia. There are medical treatments to help but side effects could result in dramatization to women.
The second model is the psychological model. This model is influenced by biological, psychological, and cultural factors. This and the biomedical model, neglect women of color, lesbians and working class women.
The third model is offered by feminists. This model asserts that eating problems are gendered. This may explain why most of the people who get this are woman and not men. This method also shows how gender socialization and sexism relate to eating problems. This model is culturally, socially, and economically enforced for female beauty to be “skinny”. This leads to anorexia and bulimia.
Most women who suffer from eating disorders start out being sexually abused. According to a study 61 percent of woman connected that the start of their eating problems started when they were being sexually abused. Usually women cope with this problem by binging, which is eating for comfort. This helped woman “numb out”. Instead of food being something to eat, food is something that woman could trust and was easy to get a hold of when ever needed. Food becomes an “addiction”.
Another important aspect of eating disorders is the sensitive subject of racism and class standing. Joselyn an African American girl remembered how her white grandmother would often tell her she would never be pretty because she was not light like her other cousins who were white and slim. She was humiliated and called fat. This caused her to have an eating disorder. Although Joselyn could not change her skin color and be white like the rest of her family she could change her weight. As her father’s business picked up he was encouraging his wife and his daughter to be slim like everyone else. As the family’s class and culture started to change In Joselyn’s eyes being skinny was the only way she could fit in. Joselyn’s eating problems were handled completely wrong and could have lead to death because of culture change class standing and racism.
After researching eating disorders it seems as though there is not enough methods to help people suffering from them. Change in culture causes a huge impact on eating disorders because now a days to be “beautiful” or “attractive” it is encouraged to be skinny.

By:Carlye

Thinness Discussion

In a world like the one we live in today, where technology and social media are essential to the daily tasks of most civilians, our values as a society are rapidly changing to meet the social requirements and stereotypes of our generation. The media becomes a source of information on how to look, how to dress, and basically, how to live your own life. This may seem fine in moderation but when people take these values and stereotypes too far, it can be seriously detrimental to their health, both mentally and physically. For example, teens and adults choose to put their own health at risk by using sunless tanning beds, and actually pay moneyto be exposed to harmful UV rays. Another example would be the eating disorders that have resulted from this cultural obsession with thinness that our society seems to value. The rise in eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, has affected as many as 7 million women and 1 million men, ages ten to early twenties.

There are three theoretical methods used to better understand and treat these eating disorders that millions of americans are struggling with each year. The first method used in describing the reasons many people develop such eating disorders is called the biomedical model. This model tends to assert that eating disorders are caused by biological factors. These factors could be things such as an imbalance of hormones in one’s body to malfunctioning neurotransmitters in a person’s brain chemistry. The biomedical model points to a person’s genetics and innate physiological features as factors that contribute to the development of such disorders, excluding the many social and cultural factors that people face. The second method, known as the psychological model, views such eating disorders as a multi-dimensional problem and includes biological, psychological and sociological factors as the causes for developing such disorders. This model indicates that these disorders may stem from a range of personal issues that an individual may be facing, such as low self-esteem or strained relationships in a person’s life. Theorists that focus on this model hypothesize that the repressed emotional problems of the individual become expressed through an abnormal relationship with food, while the cultural aspects that society tends to value simply reinforce such behavior that emphasizes thinness.

The psychological model can help explain the relationship between sexual abuse and eating disorders, in which there seems to be a definite correlation. This model suggests that the control an individual has over what they eat may serve as a mechanism for gaining a sense of identity or control over their life. Most victims of sexual abuse feel an immense loss of control over their bodies and even their life in general after being abused. Victims will often feel ashamed of their body afterwards, and may carry a sense of guilt with them for the rest of their lives. Some feel a need to push others away, in order to protect themselves and some turn to addiction to cope. Whether a person turns to drugs or food, binging offers a sense of comfort and control while masking their emotions of pain and anger. Purging may serve as a way to cleanse the victim’s feelings of being dirty and violated, or in some cases it serves as a means of self-punishment. Survivors of abuse often suffer from post traumatic stress disorder, and as the psychological method states, this types of emotional suffering drastically increases their chances of developing an eating disorder.

The third method of understanding these disorders that are dramatically increasing is called the feminist model. This model was created by feminist researchers who focused more on analyzing the nature of these diseases and the way they were classified throughout history to better explain their role throughout society. The feminist model asserts that these eating disorders are not specific to race, but rather to gender. It uses the history of women’s right to show how these eating disorders have formed and how the societal views on women throughout history have reiderated this obsession with thinness.

All three of these theoretical models help us to better understand how these disorders play a role in our society today, and mostly likely in any other society around the globe as well. Eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia are not confined to the “white americans” and can be found in almost any society today. The fact that racism and class standing have their own contributions to such eating disorders can go overlooked, due to the fact that African men and women and those who live in poverty with these diseases can go undiagnosed and untreated. As the psychological model explains, the emotional state of an individual can have a huge impact on the likelihood of developing an eating disorder. Therefore it can be assumed that people who suffer from external social stressors such as racism and those of class standing, would be more likely to develop these disorders.

All of these models offer useful explanations that aid in understanding how eating disorders can develop, how they can be treated, and how they play a role in the society we live in today. However, I do not believe that these eating disorders can be fully explained by understanding just one method, but rather by understanding all three methods as a whole. The bottom line is that it would be impossible to try and define the reasons for these disorders with solely one method. We must look at each method of analysis to completely understand this cultural obsession with thinness and the many effects it has had on our society.

By: Serene

thinness assignment fall 2011

Currently there are three theoretical models used to explain the epidemiology, etiology, and treatment of eating disorders: the biomedical, psychological, and culture of thinness model (offered by feminists). While the three theories attempt to address the causes of eating disorders through labeling them as psychological (biomedical and psychological models) or cultural problems (culture of thinness model), they fail to address certain other causes like race, poverty, and sexual abuse.
The biomedical model begins to address eating disorders such as anorexia nervosa as having biological characteristics: hypothermia, slowed heartbeat, and excessive body hair. But it often, however, fails to address a shared biological characteristic as a cause of the disorder. This model offers physiological evidence of the negative effects of long-term starving and cycles of binging and purging, but fails to address aspects of some cultural, historical, and social causes that attribute to the disease. The second model, the psychological model, states that eating disorders are multidimensional and influenced by biological, psychological, and cultural factors. It offers effective therapeutic treatment, but it also, along with the biomedical model, fails to address race, sexuality, and class standing. The third and final model, the ‘culture of thinness’ model, was created by feminists and equates eating disorders with women feeling like they need to be thin to meet the beauty standards of the time and to be successful.
One of the underlying causes of eating disorders that Becky W. Thompson talks about during in her article is sexual abuse. Throughout it Thompson explains her research on the links between sexual abuse and disordered eating habits. She says that the disorders were a survival response, and that the girls who attributed the sexual abuse to their eating disorders tried to either become thinner or chunkier in response to their own gatherings about what the ‘perverts’ wanted in little girls.
Other underlying causes of eating disorders as stated by Thompson are race and class standing. Her research states that women of color, Latina and African American women alike, sometimes develop eating disorders in response to their class standing. They may be impoverished or under stress in their current class, and so they, believing that white, thin women have it better off, try to control their weight thinking that if they become more slender and elegant they will be able to more easily move through the class barriers holding them back.
It used to be believed that eating disorders were in response to a control factor, you couldn’t control many aspects in your life so you controlled your eating habits and weight. Now it is being more debated and more causes are being discovered, like the aforementioned race, class standing, poverty, and sexual abuse. Hopefully in the future diagnosis and therapy for eating disorders will be better and more person-specific and accurate.

Obsessions with Thinness

                          

There are three theoretical models that is used to explain and treat eating disorders. First there is the Biomedical model that uses scientific research to pursue the idea that physiological is the cause for eating disorders. In their research they felt medical treatment is the best way to go to treat peoples eating disorders. In doing so many women found it to be very overwhelming.

The second model which is called Psychological model believes eating disorders have to do with many different disorders that are brought on by biological, psychological, and culture issues. They believe the best treatment for this model is therapeutic treatment.

 Then lastly there is the feminist model that says eating problems are based on gender and that women are the primary target. This model says that thinness and beauty among women are sought out culturally, socially, and economically. With this makes them sustainable to dieting, weight loss and subsequent weight gain.

 All these model differ in what they believe is the cause and treatment. But what was noticed is that all these models neglect race, sexual orientation, and working class women.

 It is believed that between one third to two thirds of women that have been sexually abused have a eating disorder. Some of the women that they interviewed in chapter 7 Cultural obsession with thinness: African American, Latina, and white women. By Becky W Thompson say that eating helps them hide the pain or momentarily forget about there trauma that they have experienced. Others say extreme dieting and bulimia was their way of coping because they feel that their perpetrator found the extra weight to be attractive. So to feel safe that their perpetrators will no longer find them attractive because they have got rid of what attracted them in the first place.

 Racism and class standing also effect in the way of causing eating disorders, For instance with race, African and Latina women are stereotyped and are thought that fat is more expected and attractive. Once their class status changed from working class to middle class the way you were expected to look changed. In the working class if you were skinny, you were thought to be sickly and that your mother was a bad or insufficient cook. But once you enter middle class fat was frowned upon and skinniness was seen as classy.

 Carol Yager – She was born in 1960 and had a pretty disturbing childhood. Before she died in 1994 she declared in an interview that the reason why she developed an eating disorder early in her childhood is because she was sexually abused by a close family member. At her peak, Yager was estimated to have weighed about 1600 pounds, which makes her the heaviest person ever recorded in human history.                                                 

                                                            

The link below tells a womens personal story on how sexually abuse was the cause for her eating disorder. Very sad!

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZnI1HQg2hM

 

Jessica

Thinness Fall 2011

Many men and women are concerned with the way they look to others. These people who are so fixated on their looks often have eating disorders. There are three theoretical models used to explain and treat eating disorders. The first of these models, the biomedical model, claims that there are scientific ties to physiological reasons for eating disorders. This particular model has nothing to do with the history, socialization, or cultural factors of this disorder.The biomedical model is focused on treating people with disorders with medical treatment. The second meodel, the psychological model, is influenced by everything the biomedical model does not discuss, such as “biological, psychological and cultural factors.” These first two models “neglect color, lesbians, and working class women.” The third model, the feminist model, believes that almost all eating disorders occurl only in women and not in men. This model discusses how sexism may relate to eating problems and how men have an impact on the women’s eating disorder. According to this model a women feels she has to be thin to get a man’s attention.

There is also a link between eating disorders and sexual abuse. Some women with an eating disorder have said that they binge to help “anestheize their felings” while others sedate themselves through eating to “alleviate anxiety and combat loneliness.” Thompson argues that eating disorders are survival strategies. She says that they exemplify food as a resource that provides comfort and security to an array of issues including sexism, heterosexism and abuse.

Race also contributes to eating disorders. For example, “an African American women, rememberes when her white grandmother told her that she would never be as pretty as her cousins because they were light skinned.” Her grandmother also commented on her weight making this girl think that though she could not change her skin color she could change her weight.

Colleen